Part Eight Of My Response To Ron Paul Hater Barry Germansky

Barry Germansky: “And, [because the Pauls are strict constructionists] nothing [in the way of legislation] of course of any magnitude would have been suggested to be implemented [by Congress, or the President], as they [the Pauls] are advocating. It’s [any law enacted not pursuant to specific enumerations] not in the Constitution. And whenever they use this rebuttal they are hoping that you will not have read the Constitution so you will be unable to counter them. They want you to be afraid and to sort of be embarrassed, not want to make a fool out of yourself, so they go uncontested because not many people have read the Constitution.”

Henry Moore: If I understand your first sentence here correctly, then I understand your point and agree with it, but not any negative conclusions you draw from that point, such as “the Pauls are mistaken in their interpretation of the Constitution or dishonest about what it says.”

Regardless, I am confident that I have shown that either my interpretation (and therefore, that of the Pauls) is either the correct one or a reasonable one. Even the founders were not in complete agreement on the exact interpretations down to the slightest of subtleties in the text or its meaning. This does not take anything away from them. It does not make THEM “hypocritical” or “crazy.”

If it is true that the Pauls want people to be ignorant of the Constitution, then why would the Pauls want people who are even mildly influenced by the Pauls or “libertarianism” to read the Constitution, a document that may be easily used to support many of their arguments, as I have shown? I mean, how do you explain all the exhortations by those two men, in spoken and written word, to read the document in question, if in fact it is in their best interest to keep people in the dark in regards to what is written and the original intent? Is it a wink, wink, nod, nod thing just between “libertarians”? Is it part of some “vast right-wing conspiracy”?

4 thoughts on “Part Eight Of My Response To Ron Paul Hater Barry Germansky

  1. Nice.
    Good point on the Constitution. IF we preferred to ignore it and wanted our choice for POTUS to do same, we WOULD, after all, be RomNots or O-bots. Obie has gone so far as to call the constitution a “flawed document”, in order to get past his working directly against it. Romney? I think Mittens has NEVER read it and could not have understood it, as evidenced by his answer to question: Would you take war-declaration(s) to Congress, or just make decision, yourself? Mitten’s response? – was basically to take it to “the lawyers”. Is that what we want in a PRESIDENT?? If so, why have a president when we have lawyers?

    Ron Paul, and only Ron Paul, seems to grasp the constitution of these UNITED states, fully. Only Paul seems to care enough to FOLLOW the document and spirit of the document, too.
    It’s time to oust Obot. It’s also time to give RomNot a bit of a nudge– to get his backside back to whichever state is his “home-state”. During the beauty pageants, how many states were Mitt’s HOME-States? Will they call PA his “home-state”, when, in actuality.., Ron Paul was BORN there? What about Texas? Since the Bushes (ugh, them again) have decided to essentially adopt RomNot, will Texas become his home, too? If so, I think some of us Texans will have something to say about that.
    Mitten’s homes? NH, MA, ME(?), UT, NEV.. where ELSE? Is this based on his MORON family living in all of these states or is it based on his MANY mansions in different areas? Regardless, the NEWZZZ-bots telling people it’s his home-state has been a successful PLOY, Everyone wants to vote for the home-team, and Romnot’s home-team seems to be EVERYWHERE.
    It’s kooky, if one pays attention to it; and of course, most do not- not really.

    • You are a Texan? Awesome!

      Well, thanks for the follow and your comment Anne. You rock!

      Good point on the home state thing too. I guess I never noticed that ploy. Probably because my eyes (and ears, if that is even possible) glaze over when ever I hear or see the MSM.

      Well. I guess I will see you on twitter.

      • Haha. Yes, I am a Texan– yeehah!
        Ron and Rand will be in Austin, Sunday– and I could not be more pleased! The Texas-Tea-Party is holding a rally on the steps of our capitol– and again, I am thrilled to have a chance to go and listen to liberty minded folk, including some GREAT Austin musicians (specifically singing songs of LIBERTY) and usual Austin pundits– though a usual Austin-pundit is not your usual MSM tool. No, they understand liberty and the constitution and are, after all, Paul supporters. So, I am on a high- just waiting to get downtown to the steps.

        I’ll be posting on my blog, and then in twitter– hoping for a GREAT day and cannot imagine it any other way.

        (GOP is short of AFFILIATES willing to be election judges, all over Texas. I think they get it, though; MUST be nicer to the Paul folk, so they will also volunteer their time to get this done. Right now, they are begging DEMS to sit-in for their GOP counterparts who cannot care enough to DO this. I, on the other hand, will be a judge in the precinct next to mine. Why not?)

  2. Pingback: Transcript Of What Ron Paul Hater Barry Germansky Said – Refuted « keimh3regpeh2umeg

Any thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s